PWAs is that they have features that were previously only available to a native app, like access to phone hardware or push notifications. There's also a natural friction with native apps, as you have to force people to install them, and that can be difficult - after all, most users don't install any apps in any given month. With a PWA, the user simply visits your website and is already using it. HTML5 allows websites to access smartphone hardware Illyes further warned to be careful because you can have your search visibility zero when switching to a
PWA if you don't pay close attention to the SEO side of things. He also talked about AMP and said that it is just a lite version of your content, designed to load much faster than a normal web page. If you are a news publication and want to monetize it, you want to jewelry retouching service use AMP. There are a ton of benefits to doing so. Access to the news carousel is an important aspect of this, but the overall speed of delivery also matters a lot to users. As the editor, you always have full control over how you create it.
Further down the Q&A, Illyes notes that AMP is mostly great from a speed perspective, and if you can make your site really, really fast without AMP, you might not need it. But overall, Illyes likes AMP because it is very fast when loading from search results. He then reiterated what Google had already said, which is that you don't get any ranking boosts for implementing AMP (unless you're lucky enough to be in the news space and sign up in the