Scenario 2: Innovative Products At work, we will encounter a good idea. When we are not sure whether it is feasible or not, we currently use the MVP job function email list model (minimum viable product) to verify the idea, put it on the market, and see the effect. job function email list Then this is to focus on cost and time, and demonstrate the results through low investment. At this time, the benefits are not clear and can be temporarily weakened. Scenario 3: High-value features In actual work, we will encounter such a function. Through preliminary research and demonstration, we have made it clear that the launch of this function is of great help and value to the product, and there are no competing products.
If it is launched as soon as possible, You can job function email list occupy the market as soon as possible and gain a leading position. At this time, we will weaken the cost, focus on the benefits and time, and launch the function earlier to gain a greater market lead. 04 From the above scenarios, costs, time, and benefits all have different emphases and concerns. Of course, job function email list in real work, it will not be as special as written in the example scene, just focus on one.
The reality is also more complex, and we need to job function email list consider more things, and balancing is a way to help us sort out and provide product decisions. Perhaps many people will understand "balance" as a "moderate", which is a bad practice. But in my opinion, any job function email list technique is just a tool. In the right situation, as long as it can help us in product decision-making, it is a good technique. The final decision on whether to do it or not is not the technique, but the technique. you. Finally, do you have any experience in using "balance" in your work, or how do you understand "balance" and "moderation